June 30, 2009

Mirror Universe

Does anyone else ever get the feeling that we're in an alternate dimension, where Barack Obama is like the Mirror Universe version of Ronald Reagan?


By that I mean, for non-Trekkie-types, evil twin?


Seriously. Obama, instead of standing up to Communists in South America, and opposing dictator regimes in other parts of the world, is actively encouraging them. It is freakin' EERIE when it isn't just plain scary as hell.

Read more...

Vanity Fair tackles Sarah Palin

Okay, I'm reading the whole thing (don't worry, my idiocy radar is turned off for this - you know what you're going to get when you read rags like Vanity Fair). I will probably wait to go off on parts of it. But these things have to be addressed:

VF: What does her prominence say about the importance of having (or lacking) a record of achievement in public life?
I'd like to have that same question answered about Barack Obama. Remember, in terms of actual experience as an executive level elected official, Sarah Palin was the only candidate in the November race with anything to speak of.

VF: Why did so many skilled veterans of the Republican Party—long regarded as the more adroit team in presidential politics—keep loyally working for her election even after they privately realized she was casual about the truth and totally unfit for the vice-presidency?
I have to turn this one around on Joe Biden.


Frankly, it's tiresome hearing the left, and even some on the right, get tangled up in Palin's "lack of experience," which doesn't play at all when you look closely and compare her to similar candidates. Also, and I know the left won't talk about this, but I think it's safe to say that McCain did a minimal amount of vetting and absolutely no training or preperation. The campaign left her hanging out to dry - something the Republican Party is now doing as practically a matter of policy.

It does bear some thought about the broader role of women in the Republican Party and the conservative movement. We're not going to get help from the media, and we aren't being at all protected by our party (au contraire, we are more likely to receive as much vitriol and ire from our own as we are the other side). I don't think Palin has ever come off as someone proud of "what she does not know;" I think she had, and has, a learning curve. But I think she IS unashamed of the fact that she has a learning curve, unlike many politicians who go into a major race with a deficit of knowledge and attempt to hide it with clever slogans and bland campaign stump speeches. It helps, too, when the media is on your side and unlikely to throw hardball questions at you - our side, male or female, is at an immediate disadvantage.

Anyway. The entire VF article is here. Weak stomachs and easy tempers need not proceed.

Read more...

Al Franken. Seriously.

Sigh. Senator-elect Al Franken.

The court decision is here
.

I like Jonah Goldberg's reaction.

More on this from a Houston news station.

Read more...

Advice

It's funny - I never was much of a Melville fan. But this sings to me, especially the political me.

"The Past is the textbook of tyrants; the Future the Bible of the Free. Those who are solely governed by the Past stand like Lot's wife, crystallized in the act of looking backward, and forever incapable of looking before." - Herman Melville, White Jacket

Read more...

June 29, 2009

SCOTUS goes 5-4 for firefighters in Ricci case

The Surpreme Court's decision on Ricci vs DeStefano came out today, and it's being hailed in some circles as a SCOTUS slam in nominee Sonia Sotomayor's direction. It seems, though, with a 5-4 split that the Court is affirming the line of thinking about Sotomayor being a carbon copy of David Souter, whom she would replace.

Good explanation via Peter Kirsanow:

The Supreme Court in Ricci held that before an employer can engage in intentional racial discrimination (i.e., throwing out the results of the promotional exam in which the highest scorers were white) for the claimed purpose of avoiding or remedying an unintentional disparate impact, it must have a strong basis in evidence to believe it will be subject to disparate-impact liability (not just sued) if it fails to take the race-conscious discriminatory action.
Best quote (from Justice Anthony Kennedy):
"Whatever the City’s ultimate aim—however well intentioned or benevolent it might have seemed—the City made its employment decision because of race. The City rejected the test results solely because the higher scoring candidates were white."
And SCOTUSBlog's (essential daily reading; check out the liveblog of today's decisions) Tom Goldstein chimes in with what he thinks the decision says about the Court's opinion of Sotomayor. Sample:
The Court indicates that the state of the law before today’s ruling was “a difficult inquiry,” and that its “holding today clarifies how Title VII applies.” It rejects the plaintiffs’ outright attack on the Second Circuit’s decision as “overly simplistic and too restrictive.”

Read more...

June 28, 2009

Quick thoughts on Michael Jackson's passing

Everyone else is doing it.....


1 - My reaction was shock, but not necessarily sadness or anything. He was only 50, and young deaths are always shocking. As for sad, well, I think his life was far sadder than his death could be. For those that loved him personally, or are remembering his younger, far more innocent days, condolences.

2 - I didn't listen to 80s music in the 80s (my folks listened to what they had liked before going overseas in the late 70s). I think my first encounter with Jackson, other than Jackson 5 stuff that still got airplay on the oldies stations my parents favored, was Black or White. So while the loss of the King of Pop is sad, it's not devastating to me because his music was more iconic than it was personal to me.

3 - The great outpouring reminds me a little of when Princess Diana died - or, in some ways, when Ronald Reagan died. It's almost belated grief, because the person in question was for all intents and purposes changed/effectively dead for awhile before actually passing.

Back to your regularly scheduled political blogging.

Read more...

Anita MonCrief and ACORN

H/T to RightWingSparkle: Kevin Jackson on Anita MonCrief. For those too consumed by other things these days (and believe me, I understand!!), here's a bit of background. Basically, MonCrief is a former ACORN employee who decided to blow the whistle on ACORN's mismanagement and corruption. Her very enlightening blog post can be found here.


Kevin's written a pretty provocative book about the Democrat Party, incidentally.


Read more...

What to do with the GOP Turncoats

Ironman at The Next Right has some thoughts.


I think there's little doubt that the socialized medicine plan Obama is pushing is worse than cap and tax. But a Republican who capitulated on cap and tax, and gets noisy on socialized medicine? Too little too late.


Read more...

A higher standard than what, exactly?

Clearly, right-wing "moralizing" is only a problem for the right. The left gets away with murder - literally.


It's not "eating our own" when we demand a higher moral standard. But let's be clear about what we want that standard to be "higher" than. We want it to be higher than what the other side demands of their own. We're not asking for superhuman morality. Just plain, everyday standards that the majority of people agree on (whether the left likes it or not). Not cheating on your wife is a good starting place.

What got me thinking: Gateway Pundit offers a different perspective on Sanford and state-run media calls for his resignation.

Read more...

June 26, 2009

Social conservatives under attack in wake of Sanford scandal

Well now, there's something I didn't expect at all. Nothing like a little controversy from inside the movement to kick off another blistering weekend spent in the safety of my first world, air-conditioned, not-green-compliant home.







I don't wish to address Sanford's infidelity here. That's between him, his wife, and God. I've prayed for him and for his wife and will continue to do so. Instead, I want to discuss what's going on over at The Next Right.

There's a lot of information and a lot of arguing in the above posts. What seems to be causing the most consternation at the moment is the question of whether or not Sanford's recently revealed infidelity is a sign that the GOP needs to drop the social conservatives and quick.

I think it goes without saying that not only is that idea incredibly naive about the GOP's past, it's also incredibly ignorant of what a "social conservative" really is. I think the label is a convenient way of describing a wing of the party that votes, as a good friend of mine is fond of saying, their values first, and everything else second. As I heard a person say in a debate over whether a conservative organization should withhold support from candidates who don't support drilling in ANWR, there are some issues that people will "die on a hill" for, and others they won't. One wing in the GOP lives and breathes two issues: abortion and gay marriage. I assume, for the purposes of the above, that's what Max Borders means by "social conservatives."

If we assume he simply means people who hold strong views on those issues, that's cutting a large chunk out of the GOP. And really, American society. But who's counting?

The Democratic Party doesn't represent the 70% of Texans who oppose gay marriage. The Democratic Party doesn't represent the over 50% of Americans who oppose abortion. So if they're ousted from the GOP, where will these people go?

Increasingly, the issues that are shaking up the grassroots in America (that word is probably too "political" for them, but that's what they are) are taxes. Spending. Ridiculous federal standards being imposed on states and localities. The erosion of states' rights. The erosion of individual freedom. The erosion of privacy. The promotion of the nanny state.

These are the Tea Party people, for whom Governor Sanford's grave mistake probably barely resonates (if they are true to their professed innocence in all things political, Sanford's name means nothing to them outside of South Carolina). Those people need a voice and a home, too. But the GOP will not be more welcoming to them if it kicks out the pro-lifers and the anti-gay marriage people. It could be more welcoming if it would enforce it's supposedly conservative fiscal stances, from the courthouse to the statehouse and the White House - if it used the broad spectrum in the "big tent" to vet candidates and promote a platform of conservatism instead of simply one issue over all others. A pro-lifer, in other words, who will stand against intrusive government, socialized medicine, excessive taxation, for the Constitution and against activist courts. For example.

We do expect more out of our elected officials than we should, that's true. We put them on pedastals, expect them to remain unblemished and pure, always forgetting they are human. On some level, even conservatives expect government to take care of them - they expect moral excellence. Is this the fault of the social conservatives?

On the contrary, it is the fault of the American way. It is the fault, too, of human desire for leaders that can be trusted and on some level worshipped. We are followers by nature - leadership goes against the grain. And when the leaders stumble, it is a bloody reminder of our own faults. Neither party is free of puritanical expectation, though it is true that the right is judged more harshly and the left given a measure of pass for being perceived social libertines.

Should social conservatives, then, be ousted from the Republican Party? Should, as Max Borders says in his post, personal values be left entirely to the private sphere? I think it is more that we need a definition - his admonition sounds dangerously liberal, echoed on Daily Kos today in their declaration that conservatives will be left alone when one of them falls if only they'll admit that abortion is a personal choice. Moralizing is not the problem. A society that condemns moral standards is the problem.

My last note. It is wrong to equate social conservatism with moralizing. I said at the outset of this post that I would give no condemnation of Governor Sanford. What would you assume by that statement? I leave you with that thought, and the idea that I consider myself conservative on social political issues as well as economic ones.


Read more...

Boehner on Cap and Tax (video via RealClearPolitics)

video

Read more...

GOP Turncoats on Cap and Tax

Via Michelle Malkin:


Read more...

Rep. Pence remarks before Cap'n'Tax vote in Congress

Read more...

June 24, 2009

Conservative Rs in TX Lege announce GOPAC-TX

Okay now, this is an initiative to get excited about.


Rep. Phil King (R-Weatherford) and Sen. Dan Patrick (R-Houston) announced the formation of GOPAC-Texas, a fundraising, recruiting, and training effort to rebuild the Republican majority in the Texas House and Senate. This is the first time something like this has been done - pairing state efforts with a national brand - and it appears to be coming from outside the usual suspects.

Could a true new day be dawning for Texas Republicans? It's too early to say, but it certainly seems that way. While GOPAC-TX will not get involved in primaries except in open seats where they have recruited a specific candidate, the people involved are some of the guaranteed conservatives in the legislature, most of whom are in "safe" districts and can concentrate on protecting the Republican flank.

King did make clear that GOPAC-TX will be working with the party, and the already-formed Texas Republican House Committee (of which familiar face Travis Griffin is executive director).

The executive board of this effort includes: Reps. Geanie Morrison, Dan Flynn, Wayne Christian, Carl Isett, Todd Hunter, Phil King, and Sens. Jane Nelson and Patrick. They're joined by former Bexar County District Judge Rene Diaz and former UT football (and two-time Super Bowl winner Denver Bronco) Dan Neil.


Read more...

Non-political blogging

Believe it or not, there are other things to blog about. My husband and I maintain a personal blog here: http://texas-traveler.blogspot.com/


Mostly travel tales, but occasionally other things seep in. No politics, though. That's what Blue Dot Blues is for.

Read more...

June 23, 2009

So what is a "politician"?

Continuing on the theme of definitions....

The warning I have for aspiring candidates - beware your supporters, for they shall turn on you the minute you show signs of being that dreaded creature, an elected official, and exhibit signs of doing your job by making tough decisions about what is the best of the possible options for being successful at what you do.

I kind of abhor Wikipedia, but I like the following breakdown of what constitutes a "politician."

Considered a politician

























































































Not considered a politician

  • Members of government who serve purely functional roles, such as bureaucrats.
  • Members of the judicial branch, law enforcement, and the military are not usually regarded as being politicians since they are generally executing or adjudicating established law and custom.
  • Ordinary citizens with the power to vote cannot properly be called politicians even though they can participate in group decision-making. A politician participates in public debate that leads to a group decision being reached, while a voter is simply responding to that debate.


Frankly, if you are "involved in politics" (and I daresay many of the Tea Party folks, especially the leaders, qualify here), you are a politician by definition.


Read more...

June 22, 2009

Definitions mean something, too

I'm in no mood to discuss this in great detail. Between the Horns losing tonight, Barack Obama's...well, Barack Obama, and general dissent and insanity in quarters where it benefits NO ONE, I'm just a touchy, angerball of a blogger tonight.


So I'm posting just this one thought.

Libertarian (small-l) is not the same as conservative.


Read more...

RedState's Erick Erickson supports Gov. Perry

Check it out here.

A pretty major grassroots endorsement of Governor Perry, whose campaign was kicked off Saturday with a leadership conference in Austin.

Coming later today - a post on the 2010 Republican primary in Texas.

Read more...

SCOTUS rules for NW Austin MUD

Well, they avoided the main constitutionality question concerning the Voting Rights Act, but the US Supreme Court ruled for Northwest Austin M.U.D. #1, saying it can bypass the pre-approval requirement when moving polling locations. A lower court had ruled otherwise.

The Voting Rights Act requires all or parts of 16 states with a history of discrimination in voting to get approval in advance of making changes in the way elections are conducted.

Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Roberts clarified that the Court is not ruling on the larger constitutionality of this provision (Section 5).

Justice Clarence Thomas, however, said, "The violence, intimidation and subterfuge that led Congress to pass Section 5 and this court to uphold it no longer remains." Given the opportunity, Thomas would have ruled Section 5 unconstitutional altogether.

A small victory for liberty, to be sure, but a victory nonetheless. The Court ruled for the M.U.D. with only one dissenting vote.

Read the full brief here.

Previous posts.

(H/T @frankreilly and @wbaustin via Twitter)

Read more...

June 19, 2009

Lou Gehrig, 70 years ago

Lou Gehrig was diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 70 years ago today. That's the same disease my mother was diagnosed with last September, and the same disease that killed my grandmother in 1979.

Go to Covering All the Bases to see what you can do to help fight this awful disease.

Gehrig's bio, from Wikipedia:

Henry Louis "Lou" Gehrig (June 19, 1903 – June 2, 1941), born Ludwig Heinrich Gehrig, was an American baseball player in the 1920s and 1930s, chiefly remembered for his prowess as a hitter and the longevity of his consecutive games played record, and the pathos of his tearful farewell from baseball at age 36, when he was stricken with a fatal disease. Popularly called "The Iron Horse" for his durability, Gehrig set several Major League records. His record for most career grand slams (23) still stands as of 2009. In 1969, Gehrig was voted the greatest first baseman of all time by the Baseball Writers' Association. Gehrig was the leading vote-getter on the Major League Baseball All-Century Team, chosen by fans in 1999.

A native of New York City, he played for the New York Yankees until his career was cut short by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), now commonly referred to in the United States and Canada as Lou Gehrig's Disease. Over a 15-season span between 1925 and 1939, he played in 2,130 consecutive games. The streak ended when Gehrig became disabled with the fatal neuromuscular disease that claimed his life two years later. His streak, long believed to be one of baseball's few unbreakable records, stood for 56 years until finally broken by Cal Ripken, Jr., of the Baltimore Orioles on September 6, 1995.

Gehrig accumulated 1,995 runs batted in (RBI) in seventeen seasons with a lifetime batting average of .340, a lifetime on-base percentage of .447, and a lifetime slugging percentage of .632. Three of the top six RBI seasons in baseball history belong to Gehrig. He was selected to each of the first seven All-Star games (though he did not play in the 1939 game, as he retired one week before it was held), and he won the American League's Most Valuable Player award in 1927 and 1936. He was also a Triple Crown winner in 1934, leading the American League in batting average, home runs, and RBIs.

Read more...

June 18, 2009

UT announces salary freeze, but not budget cuts

Well, isn't that just benevolent of Bill Powers?

Too bad a permanent tuition freeze isn't in his plans. Nor is an audit conducted by an independent firm (or, say, the Texas Comptroller's office). I wonder if they've given any thought to things they could cut from the budget.

But no, none of those things would keep UT among the "best universities in the nation." Goodness knows, to be "competitive," keeping costs high and the budget unwieldy is the only way to go.

Check out some of the comments on that Statesman post, incidentally. As usual, the public confuses the university's athletic budget and income as things handled by the UT administration, a concept not readily debunked by the UT administration (better to let them all blame Mack Brown instead of Bill Powers, right?).

It's a shame we can't get the Legislature to stop carrying water for the UT lobby long enough to address the issue at hand - lack of accountability. Tuition regulation, regular audits by the Comptroller, and subjecting university systems to sunset review. That's all I'm asking for.

Read more...

Orwell the Prophet

Victor Davis Hanson is right when he says that we've casually thrown around the terms "Orwellian" and "Orwellianism" for awhile now. He's also right when he states that no, really, it's starting to get a little too 1984-ish around here these days.

Read more...

June 16, 2009

What "stimulus" ACTUALLY looks like

Of course, I knew about this, but Governor Perry signed the bill today in Houston, so it got some national attention.


Read more...

Tonight there is a Green Revolution

"Reports of injuries, shootings, and killings are flooding the internet. Twitter has been an invaluable source - those in Iran who still know how to access it are updating regularly with picture evidence. People are being brutally beaten. Tonight will be another night without rest for so many in Iran no older than I am. Tonight there is a Green Revolution."

For more information:
PICTURES:
here and here
NEW INFORMATION:
Here - near constant updates
Here - ONTD_political live post
ON TWITTER:
@StopAhmadi,


دنیارابگوییدچطورآنهاانتخاباتمان دزدیده اند
Tell the world how they have stolen our election


- original post by One Hoopy Frood

Read more...

June 15, 2009

Why are we having a special session, really?

Spin spin spin.

The majority of political news changes meaning depending on who is reading, or writing, about it. This is why blogging is not an effective tool for changing hearts and minds, and is primarily used for punditry and journalism.

Texas' leftist blogs would have you believe, for instance, that the upcoming special legislative session, which will cost Texas taxpayers about $30k+ a day, is something to blame Texas Republicans for. Their rhetoric flatly ignores the four-day back-mic chubbing led by rogue Democrats. They seem to have forgotten the role Democratic Rep. David Leibowitz played in the last-minute killing of legislation that would have protected Texas from a costly special session by letting TXDOT and TDI continue under a safety net.

Their own party is split into factions right now, leading members angry because rogue stalling tactics killed important Democratic legislation. A caucus chairman who couldn't control his caucus. Members pitted against each other because of their party's monomaniacal efforts to kill one, just one, bill and prevent legitimate debate.

The Legislature has ONE constitutional mandate each session - to pass a balanced budget. That happened. Now the Legislature has to come back because Democrats ensured the death of TXDOT and TDI without more deliberation. Imagine the outcry, and long-term cost to taxpayers, if TXDOT did shut down? (TDI is another matter - we're better off without it)

Play on, leftists, play on. Your fiddling will be a nice accompaniment to your inevitable downfall....

Read more...

June 10, 2009

Gestapo tactics employed to prevent free speech at University of Texas

I don't use such bombastic allegorical terms lightly, so when I tell you that Orientation Advisors behaved like the Gestapo to prevent incoming UT freshmen from reading flyers handed out by Young Conservatives of Texas last night, please understand that I'm not exaggerating.

YCT member Brianna Becker gives a full account of the incident on the YCT blog.

Incoming freshmen at the University of Texas are required, as a part of their orientation to the university, to undergo "diversity training." Needless to say, there's no "intellectual diversity" component in this training, and it is straight-up liberal indoctrination. Lots of jokes could be made about Texas A&M's fish camp and the way students come out die-hard-gig-'em-Aggies-for-life, but at least, to my knowledge, fish camp is about traditions. At UT, freshmen orientation is about solidifying a way of thinking and keeping out intellectual diversity at all costs.

Clearly, given what happened when members of Young Conservatives of Texas attempted to offer a differing viewpoint to UT freshmen (at one point, an orientation advisor brandished a table leg to keep the YCT members from the freshmen), there's more going on in "diversity training" than meets the eye.

One OA, in the course of the evening's events, asserted that just being at the University of Texas means a person has an open mind. Oh, really? That's why, at UT, Texas Independence Day celebrations were shut down by the administration? That's why, at UT and so many other universities, Ann Coulter and David Horowitz are booed out of the auditoriums? That's why, at UT and other prominent Texas universities, the stated long-term goal is a physically diverse student body, but there is no one championing an intellectually diverse campus?

The message is being sent through diversity training programs that "if you've never been oppressed, you're part of the problem." Of course, that message prevails in the sociology classroom as well, but someone must have figured out that it would work better to get them while they're still in a giddy glow about getting into their first choice school instead of waiting for the doldrums of classroom life. Diversity training makes assumptions about upbringing based on skin color. And have you seen the lengths some schools have gone to in diversity training on religion?? Let's not even start talking about the way "diversity" initiatives, including "training," perpetuate racial and ethnic stereotypes. Or how diversity training is used at some universities to "fix" conservative students.

(oh, and, did the UT administration miss this study about how diversity training doesn't work?)

Luckily, as the YCT members at UT discovered, the freshmen coming to UT aren't sheep, and several of them noticed right off that something was amiss. If an authority figure is trying to keep you from reading something (to the point of actually taking flyers from students in line!), there's probably something there worth your time. If nothing else, it'll help you keep an open mind. And after, it's UT. Having an "open mind" is practically an admission requirement.

Read more...

June 09, 2009

Perry says special for sure

Any gasping and heavy sighs of disappointment you hear are all feigned.  No one can be surprised at Governor Perry's confirmation that yes, Virginia, there WILL be a special session.  We just don't know yet when, or what will be on the call.


Perry can't issue executive orders to save state agencies or conduct certain other business (remember, kids, that despite Perry's political power, he really has very little governing power, thanks to Texas' post-Reconstruction constitution that gives more power to the legislative arm of state government).  Our legislators have themselves to blame, it seems, though who takes the political hit remains to be seen - extra government does not go down well with the voters who pay attention to such things.

Take your vacations now, politicos.  Could be a loooong summer.


Read more...

FWST: Weatherford rep says local-option bill lacked spending safeguards

Knock 'em dead, Rep. King!  From the Fort Worth Star-Telegram:


The new transportation taxes proposed this session failed to acknowledge current economic times, the recession, growing unemployment and the credit crisis. Texas families already pay an average 32.7 percent of their limited income to the government in local, state and federal taxes.

Texas families and businesses simply have no more money to give to government, and particularly not now. Senate Bill 855 and House Bill 9 sought to authorize new tax options that included additional fees for car registration and vehicle emissions. The final version called for local elections to impose a motor fuel tax up to 10 cents per gallon, up to a doubling of the driver license fee from $24 to $48, and up to a $60 vehicle registration fee.

These new taxes and fees would raise billions, but they would hit low-income families and small businesses the hardest. There are other less regressive options that make better economic sense.

Read more...

WSJ: "The Only Statue That is Smiling"


From this story on the Wall Street Journal website:


"You are there." The rotunda of the U.S. Capitol, that great, sandstone-walled, light-filled hall ringed with statues of the great of American history—Jefferson, Washington, proud Andrew Jackson in his flowing cape, Eisenhower, U.S. Grant, his eyes surveying the terrain as if he sees something out there in the wilderness. It's 11 a.m. Wednesday, June 3, 2009, and Ronald Reagan marches in, surrounded by his peers. Actually his newly installed statue is unveiled there, in a ceremony attended by officials of both parties (including the speaker of the House and the leaders of the minority), his wife, Nancy, and a few hundred of his friends, appointees, staffers and cabinet members. It was standing room only.
Read the whole thing. It's a good story. A good pick-me-up after reading more of the same tax-and-spend socialist nightmare coming out of the current White House.

Read more...

Travis County Republican networking events this week

The Travis County Republican Party is hosting a "Tea Party Tuesday" networking opportunity tonight at 360 Primo in the Arboretum. 5:30 to 7pm, casual come-and-go. Bring a friend, have the chance to meet other Republicans and liberty-minded folks in Travis County (YES, they exist - trust me!!). Tea, coffee, and stronger drinks available for purchase (and I highly recommend the gelato!).

Also, the Austin Tech Republican club will meet tomorrow at 11:30am at 360 Primo for their regular monthly meeting. Tomorrow's meeting will feature a Texas legislative update and the usual opportunity to meet other conservative techies in north Austin.

Read more...

June 05, 2009

Suggestions for a Best and Worst 10 Texas Legislators

A bit tongue-in-cheek in places, but some suggestions for the ten Best and ten Worst Texas Legislators.  

BEST

1 - John Zerwas:  Saved Ed Kuempel's life.  Also maintained complete cool while being unnecessaily pestered by Roland Gutierrez during the Memorial Day chub-a-thon.

2 - Carl Isett:  Nobody else had the guts to put their name on two of the most controversial bills of the session, the TDI and TXDOT sunset bills.

3 - Joe Pickett:  For opposing the local option transportation tax in the sunset bill, proving what a Transportation Committee Chairman SHOULD act like.

4 - Dan Patrick:  For making a temporary tax cut proposal permanent.

5 - Frank Corte & Robert Duncan:  For defining "public use" constitutionally to prohibit the government from taking your property for economic reasons.

6 - Craig Eiland:  For gracefully putting up with his own party's "chubbing" activities over Memorial Day weekend.

7 - Sylvester Turner:  For killing an energy bill would increase utility rates statewide on all citizens to create a fund that only a priveleged few could utilize.

8 - Steve Ogden:  For his leadership in the budget process.  The Senate had their act together on SB 1 before the House even had a committee meeting.

9 - Richard Raymond:  For inadvertantly stopping about $3 billion in additional spending through his incessant chubbing (that makes Jim Pitts look real good, by the way) because his party knew they could not muster more than 60 votes to kill voter I.D.

10 - Larry Taylor:  For building an infrastructure in the Republican Caucus and holding it together, Tommy Merritt notwithstanding.

Honorable Mention:  Phil King.  Got a bill passed that promotes clean coal technology.  Now that's energy reform!

--

WORST

1 - John Carona:  For stubbornly trying to increase taxes during tough economic times, and letting the lobbyists do the tough work for him.

2 - Jim Dunnam:  On principle.  But really, for pushing special interests and losing control of his caucus in the waning days of the session.

3 - Burt Solomons:  Ref. #7 above.  Solomons was the joint author of that energy bill, and was sitting as speaker when Turner was challenging the germaneness of the amendments.  Bad form to rule on points of order on your own bill (worse form to ignore the parliamentarian when she tells you you're wrong three times!)

4 - Roland Gutierrez - I think he's still chubbing at the back mic.

5 - Tommy Merritt:  The "caucus of one" left his own bill pending in his own committee because he forgot he presented it, and the bill died.  

6 - Kevin Eltife:  A Republican should not be carrying a business tax increase - haven't we learned our lesson?  Furthermore, carrying the unemployment insurance legislation for President Obama despite public disapproval was bad form.

7 - David Leibowitz:  For not allowing the House to pass sunset safety net bills because he was standing up for the trial lawyers.  I mean, really.  

8 - Kristi Thibaut:  At one point during a Land and Resource Management committee meeting, she told a fellow legislator:  "I haven't read your bill.  What the hell does it do?"  Thibaut's antics and radical views are unfit for the office.

9 - Dan Branch:  If you're going to propose and push for a new law school, don't you think you should support having more lawyers in the state?  

10 - Judith Zaffarini:  For ignoring 24 co-authors of legislation that would limit tuition increases. 

Dishonorable Mention:   Rafael Anchia and Todd Smith.  The House could have had a legitimate debate on voter i.d., but Anchia and Smith's "negotiations" stalled the process and created a situation ripe for discord.  Smith's prickly attitude concerning his own party's and own caucus' feelings about the bill didn't help much, either.

Read more...

Austin leads in big-city job growth

Take that, recession! The Statesman is reporting that the city of Austin led the nation in job growth from April 2008 to April 2009. It ain't a perfect picture, but hey, I'll take it.


The Austin area had the nation's strongest job market among big cities last month, according to data released Wednesday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Among the 38 metro areas with a work force of at least 750,000, only Austin gained jobs from April 2008 to April 2009, the bureau said.

It was the third month in a row Austin had earned that distinction.

Austin added 3,400 jobs in that period, a 0.4 percent gain that brought the regional
job count to 781,400.

In January, Austin, Houston and San Antonio were the only large metro areas that had more jobs than a year earlier.

But Houston and San Antonio have been losing jobs since then.

Austin's job picture isn't all rosy: The area has been losing manufacturing and construction jobs at an accelerating pace, but those losses are being offset by gains in
government, retailing and services fields.

Central Texas is holding up better in the recession than other technology hubs.

In April, the Silicon Valley area lost jobs at a 4.4 percent annual rate. Portland, Ore., was down 4.7 percent, Seattle was down 3.4 percent, and Raleigh, N.C., was down 3.3 percent.

Some smaller cities also racked up gains, including Midland, up 2.2 percent, and Odessa, up 2.9 percent.


Read more...

"If they get card check, Wal-Mart will be cut in half"

The Morning Joe Crew talks unions.



Read more...

Best and worst are subjective terms

Do you still need proof of the liberal bias in mainstream print media?

Look no further than Texas Monthly magazine's Top Ten Best and Worst Legislator list for the 81st Legislative Session.

The truth of the matter is that we're all biased, we all have our opinions, and the story of the 81st legislature is going to differ depending on who is talking. What qualifications do you set forth to determine what is "best" and "worst" about an elected official? For me, tax-hiking, government-growing, self-important acolytes or seekers of power at the expense of constituents would equal worst - clearly Texas Monthly has a different idea.

That's not to say that I can't agree with some of their choices - Rep. John Otto and Rep. John Zerwas do deserve the kudos given. Zerwas in particular, if for no other reason than his calm, collected response to increasingly hysterical Democratic efforts to chub the Local and Consent Calendar and prevent a vote on voter identification legislation.

But being an "insurgent Republican" (the moniker given to Plano Rep. Brian McCall) is not good enough to make someone one of the "best" legislators. In Sen. Carona's case, his hysterical grasping of straws to make the case for higher taxes is touted as "defiant and resolute" support for his own ill-conceived legislation. Again, not good enough. The salivating over Sen. Watson, who represents only the far-left in Austin instead of his entire constituency, and the blind eye turned toward Republicans whose power play took precedent, is enough to expose Texas Monthly's intentions: champion moderates and liberals, largely ignore conservatives except where you can't, and pretend that you don't have an agenda when nothing could be more obvious.

Looking at the worst list, most of it isn't surprising (except possibly Rep. Dunnam's addition), and the reasoning penetrates even my biased and cynical reading of the list. But gutting Sen. Tommy Williams simply over the two-thirds rule (an archaic tool used by the Senate to prevent actual debate) was a bit uncalled for.

I'm just another pundit, really, and I don't yet have a best/worst list for the session - admittedly, I would like to give my bias a chance to relax into a relatively objective view of what was a roller-coaster of a legislative session. But Texas Monthly has to worry about timeliness, and selling issues, and the short political memory of the vast majority of citizens would quickly lose interest if the TM staff didn't get on the ball early.

Ratings of legislators will come out shortly from several organizations, and I for one look forward to seeing how they compare. That's a better judge, in many ways, when you have a political agenda to begin with. Rarely if ever does a legislator cross the partisan line to represent all factions fairly and with grace, which appears to be the criteria for Texas Monthly's list - there are possibly a handful in the Texas House today, and a couple of them receive no attention for their efforts. As it should be.

Read more...

June 03, 2009

Travis County Republicans endorse in PEC races

Elections for the board of the Pedernales Electric Co-Operative are taking place right now, and end on June 12. The Travis County Republican Party has endorsed candidates in this race:

The Travis County Republican Party endorsed the candidacies of Sandy
Jenkins and Linda Kay Rogers for the District 1 and District 6 positions,
respectively, on the Pedernales Electric Cooperative Board. The elections are
now underway and end June 12.

"In the view of the committee that reviewed these candidates, the next
PEC Board will need to move past issues that have been settled with regard to
transparency and openness," said Rosemary Edwards, chairwoman of the Travis
County Republican Party. "We feel confident that Jenkins and Rogers will do much
more than other candidates to improve the coop's bond ratings which will lower
interest rates for bond payments and therefore lower the charges that ultimately
fall upon ratepayers.

"Opponents in the race appear to want to make PEC an environmentalist
proving ground with no consideration of cost to the residents who rely on PEC
power. We think Jenkins and Rogers offer a more reasonable and measured choice
than their radical environmentalist opponents who have no consideration for the
ratepayers," Edwards said.


More information about the candidates can be found at their blogs, at http://www.sandyjenkinsforpec.blogspot.com and www.rogersforpec.blogspot.com. More information on the elections and candidates can also be viewed at www.pec.coop.

Read more...

Sandefer: Just say no...to a business degree

The Acton Business School's Jeff Sandefer has some rather surprising advice for parents and students. Via the John Pope Center's Clarion Call:

Your son or daughter wants advice about which college major to pursue. You
respond: What about a business degree? No, it is not as enriching as liberal
arts or as rigorous as physics, but at least it would prepare your child for a
rewarding career, right?

Logical, understandable—and dead wrong. If your child is interested in
business, the worst thing you can do is encourage him or her to get a business
degree—either undergraduate or MBA.

What standing do I have to say this? I am a successful entrepreneur who,
for over twelve years taught at the graduate level at a major Texas public
university. In other words, I’ve been inside the “belly of the beast” of higher
education, observing business school classes, analyzing curriculum, and
listening to professors in the faculty lounge in unguarded moments. In other
words, I’ve seen parts of academia that parents, students, and donors never
visit.


You can read the whole thing here.

Read more...

June 02, 2009

Video: Ted Cruz speaking at Fort Bend County Tea Party

Read more...

Scenes from the 81st

Pics in this post were taken by myself and members of my household throughout the legislative session. I think they capture the theme quite well. Please excuse the blurriness in some - cell phone cameras only do so much.



Snakes! Provided by the Sweetwater Chamber of Commerce in honor of the annual Rattlesnake Round-Up.



Two lobbyists having a lightsaber duel.


Citizens lined up to testify on SB 362, the voter identification legislation, before the Committee of the Whole Senate in March.

Passing HCR 16, changing the official state dinosaur. Yeah.

A citizen holding up the Republic of Texas flag at Rep. Creighton's press conference on HCR 50, the sovereignty/10th Amendment legislation, in early April.


Governor Perry addressing the RightOnline blogger conference on May 23.


The first-ever rally for tax increases (the TLOTA) at the State Capitol, held on May 29. In this photo are Senator Wendy Davis (D-Fort Worth), Senator Kirk Watson (D-Austin), Senator John Carona (R-Dallas), Rep. Vicki Truitt (R-Fort Worth) and Rep. Mike Villareal (D-San Antonio). The "Texas Not Taxes" sign is being held up behind Sen. Carona by Americans for Prosperity's Peggy Venable - about 30 grassroots activists showed up to be "anti-protesters" against the taxes proposed by Carona and Truitt.



Dead legislation! This is a stack of dead bills the morning of sine die on June 1. The black spot you see is an eyepatch, put there in honor of Rep. Rene Oliviera (D-Brownsville).




Mourning some dead legislation on sine die.


The Texas State Capitol on sine die, June 1, 2009. Beautiful day in Austin!!

Read more...

Perry says it's "too early" to make decision on special session

After 2005's Summer of the Special Session(s), I think it's perfectly natural for Texas political junkies to take about a five minute breather when the gavel falls on sine die before they begin wondering if the governor is going to call everyone back to address some major issue.



The chaos and headaches that came out of the 80th legislative session in 2007 were enough to hold us over for two years, and the last couple of weeks certainly seem like plenty to hold us now until 2011. Unfortunately, the Democrat shenanigans in the House and the mudslinging from a certain Dallas senator wreaked enough havoc to leave some serious unfinished business behind.



Now, Governor Perry said several times in the last few weeks that the one thing he would be ready to call a special session over would be windstorm insurance. I was at an event over Memorial Day weekend at the Capitol where he said that very thing to a room full of bloggers and live-Tweeting activists. The legislature passed a windstorm insurance bill, and it seems like that crisis is averted.



But the legislature adjourned sine die without addressing the sunset problem. Five state agencies hang in the balance because legislation enabling them to continue was left to die on the vine. TXDOT, for instance, died at midnight Sunday night, when the bill was postponed in a wrangle over the conference committee report - it was likely to die regardless, with Carona's filibuster threat, and Pickett saved us all from that nightmare. There was still a chance to save TXDOT, the Texas Department of Insurance, and the others with HB 1569, the "safety net" bill that would allow the agencies to continue operating and undergo the sunset process again in 2011. But that bill was, for lack of a better word, chubbed into oblivion on Sunday night as well, by Rep. David Leibowitz (D-San Antonio).



A last-minute Hail Mary by Rep. Jim Pitts (R-Waxahachie), HCR 291, passed the House but didn't get traction in the Senate. HCR 291 was a resolution that would extend through 2011 the agencies that would receive federal stimulus funds - meaning TXDOT and TDI. Despite the overwhelming support in the House, there were serious questions raised about the constitutionality and legality of HCR 291 - the 29 members who voted against it were very concerned about this, and a point of order was raised and overruled. After passing the resolution, the House did some more ceremonial singing and dancing before adjourning sine die just after 6pm.



Meanwhile, the Senate was immediately concerned about HCR 291. They recessed for the better part of two hours, each of the caucuses met twice to consider what to do, and ultimately the entire Senate rejected HCR 291 before adjourning around 9pm. The post-sine die response to all of this from newly-elected President Pro Tem of the Senate Sen. Steve Ogden (R-Bryan) was that the blame for the Legislature's failure to save TXDOT, TDI, and the others lay with the House. Speaker Straus brushed off that criticism.



While most politicos and political junkies are now either literally or figuratively sleeping off the 140 day wrangle, the questions have already been asked.



1 - Are the Texas Dept. of Transportation, and the Texas Dept. of Insurance, and the other agencies, effectively dead? - More or less. There are things that can be done, including an executive order from the Governor, to keep these agencies alive. The way sunset works: an agency undergoes sunset review during the interim prior to the session before the official sunset date set for that agency. The Sunset Review Board gives recommendations, and a bill is crafted and filed to fine-tune the agency. The legislature debates and votes on that legislation. The agency is then either shut down or continued. If the bill does not pass, for whatever reason, the agency is then subjected to a systematic shut-down. The date of sunset for TXDOT, TDI, and two others is Sept. 1, 2010. This means that unless something is done, beginning Sept. 1 of 2009 (this year), the agencies' services and duties will be assigned to other agencies, and they will operate on "skeleton crews" through the final sunset date. The Texas Racing Commission has an extra year; their sunset date is Sept. 1, 2011.



2 - Will there be a special session? According to Governor Perry in this morning's press conference, maybe and maybe not. As stated above, the windstorm insurance legislation that primarily concerned the governor passed and is being sent to his desk. Scuttlebutt at the Capitol yesterday held that if there is a special, Gov. Perry will wait until after the veto period (the 20 days after sine die) and the July 4 holiday to call it. Speaker Straus has stated that he doesn't think there's a need for a special. Lt. Gov. Dewhurst is mum so far. But the final authority lies with the governor, and so far, he's playing it down. I'll have another post on a special session and what it could mean for Gov. Perry later today.



3 - Whose fault was this, really? Lots of fingers to point, and I'll probably miss a few, but the first one has to aim at Sen. Carona. The TXDOT sunset bill, HB 300, passed the Senate with his local option tax increase attached, and the House was adamantly opposed to the tax from the get-go (they let the House version die without a floor debate prior to the chubbing, grassroots efforts and the chubbing killed the Senate version while it was in the House, and the House voted to instruct the conference committee on HB 300 to reject the tax provision). TXDOT died because of DFW rail and taxpayer-funded lobbying efforts to raise taxes unnecessarily. The Texas Dept. of Insurance bill died thanks to chubbing - it's only hope was the safety net bill. And finally, Rep. David Leibowitz, and doubtless some of his Dem colleagues in the House, get a portion of the blame as well. Killing the safety net bill ensured the final death of those agencies and if we get a special session, that's the ultimate reason why.



Honestly, the chubbing was the big killer and big problem of the final days of the 81st session. Time-wasting in the House in an effort to prevent legitimate debate on voter identification legislation (read: Democrats trying to avoid taking a vote on a popular issue that would have cost them seats) also prevented a good deal of important legislation from passing, both good and bad. If the legislature is called back, if Governor Perry overlooks the possible political backlash from a special session to address these major issues, it won't be difficult to figure out who is to blame, but it also won't matter. The work has to get done, whatever that looks like, and the fact remains that neither chamber came out of this smelling like spring bluebonnets.

Read more...

June 01, 2009

Sine Die - At long last!

Blue Dot Blues will return in full swing....well, probably tomorrow.  After all, looks like we will have a special session to save TXDOT and TDI.  


Blah.

Anyway.  Thanks to all the legislators and especially legislative staff who worked so hard for the last 140 days.  

SLEEP NOW.

Read more...

Pictures from tax hike "rally" on 5/29/09







Read more...

Spin baby spin - Carona wrong on why TXDOT was pulled

The conference cmte report on HB 300, the TXDOT bill, was eligible in the House at 11:40pm.  At 11:40pm(-ish), there was a motion to postpone it.  The safety net bill was brought up instead, valuable time was lost, and HB 300 died when the gavel fell in adjournment.


Senator Carona is chortling to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram that Chairman Pickett "had to admit we had the votes."   That's classic spin - and a pretty damn big leap if you ask me.

It's entirely likely that Pickett, who has every reason to be pretty fed up with Carona, especially after that letter earlier today, decided to employ some strategy of his own.  I think postponing the bill was the House's way of telling Carona to shove it (had they done it in Italian, perhaps Carona would get that).  If the bill had to die, it was not going to be on Carona's terms.  Plus, we were saved Carona's long-winded martyrdom speech.  

Pickett did enquire earlier in the evening about the rules, and had it confirmed that the bill's author could move to disband the conference committee and accept the Senate amendments.  Had that happened, it's highly unlikely the votes were there to accept the TLOTA provisions.

The House reconvenes at 10am tomorrow.  A day that is usually filled with a lot of pomp, general merriment, and a huge sigh of relief will be filled with some tense moments for sure.

Read more...

BIG SHOCKER - TX House does...nothing

Well, except effectively kill the TXDOT sunset bill before Carona had the chance to give his whiny filibuster.


Rep. Leibowitz got up to the back mic when Rep. Isett brought up HB 1959, the "safety net" bill that would save the agencies whose sunset bills did not pass for whatever reason (as far as I understand it).  He effectively killed the bill asking questions and driving the debate right up to midnight, then made a privileged motion to adjourn.  Which passed, 86 to 59.

So the House adjourned, and several pieces of legislation died in the offing.  Now, unless there's a 2/3 (100) vote to suspend rules tomorrow, good and bad legislation will remain buried.

Special session?  With so many state agencies in the balance (including TXDOT), I think you can bet on it.  

Less than 24 hours to go.  And Rep. Coleman reminded us earlier, in reference to CHIP - "it ain't dead until sine die."

Read more...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP