I'm sure I should be blogging about other things, in an effort to promote conservative values in a pro-active, positive way. And I'll get back to that, but first I've got some things to say to my fellow Republicans.
A new Rasmussen report came out today, revealing that Republicans (at least those polled - remember the old quote about statistics) see their party as "leaderless." Given all the hoopla over Rush Limbaugh and Michael Steele in the last couple of weeks, it's not difficult to see why Republicans feel that way. Most days, and I'm a pretty dedicated and loyal Republican, I don't sense that we have a leader, either.
This same poll reveals that Democrats overwhelmingly believe that President Obama is the leader of their party. I think he's a titular head of the party at the most. The real leaders are Nancy Pelosi and David Axelrod. But Obama is president, and he's prettier on camera than Pelosi, and Axelrod is an operative, not a public face. So with all that in mind, it's no wonder Obama is perceived to be the leader. For all intents and purposes, he is. After all, a true leader delegates, and Obama's great at that (if by "delegate" I'm allowed to mean "lets everyone else do the work").
If perception is key, then why don't a majority of Republicans believe Rush Limbaugh is our leader (or Sarah Palin, Michael Steele, etc)? My guess on Limbaugh would be that there are a number of self-identifying Republicans who believe he's too polemic to represent them. My guess on Palin, there are a great many Republicans unwilling to embrace her after the shelacking she took from all sides (I'm looking at you, Beltway Republicans) during the election. As for Steele - well, let's face facts. A Republican who apologizes for Republicans does not a reliable leader make.
Limbaugh (yes, I listen to his show on occasion - I also read Peggy Noonan's columns. I believe in being well-rounded) said on his show today that Republicans don't have a leader because it's not an election cycle, and we don't have a current presidential nominee. That's a good point, and if we take that through to it's natural conclusion, we have to state that George W. Bush and John McCain were our "leaders" prior to the election in November. And if that is the case, it is no wonder that Republicans seem scattered, distracted, angry, and very nearly apathetic.
I was critical of Bush during his tenure in the White House, so I feel no twinge of Republican conscience in being so now. Likewise with McCain - I didn't vote him in the primary, and up until the moment he was officially nominated at the convention, I was holding out hope for someone else to take the reigns. I suspect I'm like many Republicans with regard to John McCain. Bush represents a very irresponsible period in the history of the Republican Party. While I believe he largely acted in the right with regards to foreign policy (an unpopular opinion, I admit), I think he was dead wrong on domestic fiscal policy. It wasn't until Pelosi took the speakership that Bush was willing to threaten veto. It wasn't until they took the majority in Congress that Democrats swung to the left of the Republicans on domestic fiscal policy. John McCain represents a lot of what has been wrong with the party, in terms of "bipartisan" action (PS - if you're the only Republican in a room, it's not bipartisanship - you're a Democrat), politically correct positions on immigration reform, and other things (a literary way of saying I've typed too long). It seems like ages ago, but McCain-Feingold ruined John McCain for me, and it was a bitter pill to swallow supporting him in the general election.
I don't doubt that I am not the only Republican who thinks this way.
The Republican Party must turn away from apology, from "bipartisan" action that really means voting according to the Democratic Party platform, and from leaders who believe the only way we can win elections is to tout our pro-life plank. There is a LOT more that differentiates a Republican and a Democrat than just being pro-life or pro-choice. The sooner we start doing and saying these things, the sooner we can determine who is our leader - because we will finally have a chance to see who is a Republican, and who just says so to win elections in their district.
Right now, the path for the Republican Party is fraught with potholes and creeping vines, but it's not unnavigable if our leadership will start behaving as though being a Republican is something to be proud of. If they will start promoting our platform (in Texas, this is crucial) and vowing to hold elected officials accountable to that platform, we can find our way out of this hole.
The best advice I can think of for Chairman Steele is to wear the name Republican with the same note of pride that one wears the name American. We talk a lot about getting back to Ronald Reagan's party - Reagan would be appalled that Republicans are suddenly ashamed of being Republican. Let's get our party back on track now so that we can get back to the business of winning elections and standing up to liberals at every level of government.
Read more...