July 22, 2008

Let's abolish the USPS

Oh, I'm so serious about this one. My husband and I have discussed it over the last few days, and if we got to choose which useless bureaucracy to axe first, it would be the United States Postal Service. We've had our share of adventures with various inept government agencies in 2008, starting with the Transportation Security Agency at LAX on our way home from our honeymoon, going to the Texas Department of Safety, and now the USPS (surprisingly, the Social Security Administration was the easiest to deal with).

We bought a house recently, and moved in just last week. The day we signed the final papers and got our keys, I went to the USPS website and submitted a change of address for each of us. Of course, I know we'll still get some mail at our old apartment (I've done too many changes of address in the last four years), but I figure we could start forwarding stuff immediately.

Our new neighborhood has community mailboxes, a practice I disagree with wholeheartedly but cannot really change at this point. It means we have to get mailbox keys - okay, fine. So, my husband calls the USPS main helpline and gives them our street address and zip code. We figure it will be the post office that's less than a mile from us. But no, it'll actually be the post office almost two miles from us. We scratch our heads, move on (probably a zip code thing). He then calls the post office in question to find out what we need to bring with us.

Four calls later, he finds out. The first three calls took place at 9:15, 9:30, and 10:30am, and all were endless ringing and no picking up (not even an automated info voice message, or a voice mail box!). The fourth call is answered with a curt "hello" - no identification that this is, in fact, the post office picking up the phone and not Joe Sixpack on Mockingbird Lane. We need proof of ownership of our home and photo ID to get the key.

(WITNESS THE INSANITY - it takes PHOTO ID to get a mailbox key, but not to VOTE.)

So my husband goes up to the post office this afternoon. After witnessing a lot of incompetence and also consumer ignorance while standing in line for half an hour, he makes it to the counter only to discover that keys must be ordered.

When will they get here? Maybe Friday, but probably next week. Will they call us or notify us in some way? No, we just have to call (and they don't ANSWER THE PHONE) and find out that way.

Seriously? It's a damned good thing we have online bill pay.

The US Postal Service is antiquated and exemplifies the folly of bureaucracy and government waste. Can someone explain to me why it is that employees of the federal government are able to join a union and are able to strike? Aside from that, FedEx and UPS (along with other independent delivery chains) do a much more efficient job and are far friendlier to their customers.

This one instance was not enough to sour me on the USPS, but years of dealing with long lines (with one or two clerks at the counter!), lost mail, delayed mail, rudeness, and red tape have done me in. I'm ready for the abolition of the USPS.

Read more...

July 21, 2008

McCain to announce VP choice?

Robert Novak is reporting that sources close to the McCain campaign are saying he'll announce his choice for VP this week.

According to Conservative for Change, McCain is planning an oddly-timed trip to New Orleans this week as well.

Could Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal be the pick, like so many conservatives are hoping (and kind of fearing - while it's nice to have someone so conservative be considered, at the same time we all know Louisiana is benefitting tremendously from Jindal's leadership)?

Or will it be Mitt Romney, as Novak speculated at the Defending the American Dream dinner last Friday?

Read more...

July 20, 2008

Michael Williams at RightOnline Summit

Read more...

July 19, 2008

Hot Air coverage of Malkin speech

Captain Ed did a great job with his coverage of Michelle Malkin's speech:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/07/19/right-online-conference-michelle-malkin/

Read more...

Afternoon at the Arboretum

Great time meeting Michelle Malkin; she's very down-to-earth and friendly. Picture forthcoming.

I'm wearing a "Draft Dan Patrick, Gov 2010" button that's caught a lot of attention, including that of one of his original campaign leaders, Gail Stanart. So far all reaction has been positive, but a few people have said "What about Greg Abbott?" I think that's a fair question, but my response is still that I am supporting Dan Patrick until the filing deadline has passed, and if he gets in, I'm supporting him in the primary. I will support anyone (Republican) but Rick Perry in the general election for governor in 2010.

First panel I went to featured Ken Emanuelson of The Reagan Coalition, David Kralik, Ryan Gravatt, and Maggie Thurber. Lots of fantastic discussion about what "winning online" actually means. Like anything else, it's about measurables. How many hits, click-throughs, etc. Gravatt mentioned that he doesn't count email open rates anymore, since it can be highly deceiving, and says a 25% open rate is respectable. Emanuelson and Kralik talked a lot about open-source and how to get an offline group started from an online group. Thurber discussed all of these things and also touched on how she, as an elected official, responded to different kinds of communication (phone, email, fax, in that order, and she dismissed letters - sounds about like every elected official responds to constituent communication).

A great discussion on transparency in government spending took place in a panel entitled "Show Me the Money." Talmadge Heflin of Texas Public Policy Foundation and Byron Schlomach of the Goldwater Institute did presentations on their separate projects, on state and local gov't transparency. Schlomach - "Transparency is a whole lot more than just money" in reference to why we need to know about government debt, where the money is going, public official salary disclosure. Good stuff.

Grover Norquist is now talking about what Americans for Tax Reform has been doing, much like he was earlier today. "Until spending is a vote-getting issue, elected officials won't make changes." A bit of a "duh" statement, but he's right. We have to hold them accountable at the polls. It's got to be about far more than just being a social conservative. This country can't sustain fiscal liberalism for long, and we're headed too far, too fast down that path.

Next up, "Shaping the Future: Youth Politics and New Media," with Laura Morales of Memoirs of a Young Conservative.

Read more...

MICHELLE MALKIN!!!

Okay, I admit it, I'm a fangirl.

Mrs. Malkin is on stage right now, and (I promise this part's not biased) she's easily the best speaker of the day. She's talking about why blogging is important, why she wants that to be the first thing she's remembered as one day.

Blogging is not something we do in secret; this is what we do to keep our fellow Republicans and conservatives in line! This is what we do to enlighten our readers about what is really happening on this side of the aisle - the MSM isn't going to tell these stories, and someone has to.

Quote:

"There's too much of a beltway mentality that says we're not doing enough. But, YES WE ARE!"

She's also the first speaker of the weekend to bring up Tony Snow, who we all miss.

Michelle Malkin has also brought up Bill Russell, a Republican running against Jack Murtha for Congress. Go support him in his efforts today!

Read more...

Erick Erickson of RedState.com

Kicks off with: "It's great to be in Austin and not be indicted by Ronnie Earle."

Hear, hear!

Erick is the founder of http://www.redstate.com, a conservative blogging clearinghouse.

He is talking now about Dr. Samuel Prescott, who was instrumental in Paul Revere's success. Erick tells us, we don't have to be Paul Revere, we can be the small-town farmers who spread the word while Revere rode on to tell the next town that the British were on the way.

==

(Also, I just realized that I'm sitting next to Ed Morrissey, the famous Captain Ed, formerly of Captain's Quarters and currently of Hot Air)

Read more...

Watchdog Website of the Year

Jason Moore is presenting the award for Watchdog Website of the Year right now, and the honor is going to Dianna Pharr, from Austin, TX!

Dianna's website is http://www.keepeanesinformed.com. She reveals everything she can about Eanes ISD, and does a fantastic job. She's a fantastic activist and I'm proud to know her. Congratulations, Dianna!

Read more...

Congressman John Carter

Just told us that as conservatives in Austin, TX, we live in dangerous territory, and need our right to keep and bear arms!

Carter is now talking about what's been happening in Washington in terms of the oil and gas industry. Pelosi and her gang want to federalize the industry, take it out of the private sector and make it an arm of the federal government. When Republicans tell them no way, no how, that's crazy, they respond with "Heh. Wait till next year."

That's frightening. VOTE REPUBLICAN!

Read more...

Elizabeth Ames Jones

Jones, one of Texas' three Railroad Commissioners, gave a fantastic speech on energy this morning. She reminded us that it was American crude oil that gave the Allies the mobility they needed to defeat Hitler and Hirohito. She admonished us to recall that we have the supplies, we have the resources, and that it won't be man's institution of government that solves our energy problems. It will be hard work in the private sector, freed from stifling regulation, that will do the job.

Jones wrapped up with a call to her fellow Republicans to take back the party from socialism, and to remember the lessons of 2006.

2006, for Texans, was a defeat of monumental proportions because we had a top-of-the-ballot incumbent candidate who did nothing to energize the grassroots. In a fit of pique, the base stayed home. It happened nationwide; in Texas, we're still reeling, and we face the 2008 election armed with nothing more, and some might argue less, than what we had back then. It's time to take control and take the party, and our movement, back.

Read more...

Merrie Spaeth - Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and Spaeth Communications

Merrie Spaeth, a member of the Reagan Society board of directors, is speaking right now about communications mishaps and the upcoming election. She talks about negative words and reminds us with clips just how damaging they can be. Good stuff.

She's now introducing Michael Williams, Texas Railroad Commissioner. YES!!!!!!!!

Read more...

Grover Norquist

AFP's National Summit is taking place in Washington DC on October 10 and 11. Last year's first-ever national gathering was an amazing experience, and if you have a chance to go, you definitely should. Especially if you haven't had the opportunity to attend this kind of thing in the past.

-

Grover Norquist is speaking now, and he's talking about the NRA and the Second Amendment, and now the social conservative movement and how it got going. If you're not familiar with Norquist, he's the leader of the center-right in Washington and head of Americans for Tax Reform.

His speech is largely about how the conservative movement works because what we all really want is to be left alone, especially by the government. That's a perfect way to describe conservatism, at least true conservatism. Being told what kind of lightbulbs to use in our homes, where and when we can practice our faith or free speech, etc - these are the kinds of things conservatives are against, and what makes the coalition work is this fundamental principle.

"The Left is made up of competing parasites."

"Republicans who vote for tax increases are the rats in the Coca-Cola bottles."

Great quotes.

Read more...

Stephen Moore on the housing crisis

"NO BAILOUTS!!"

To rousing cheers and applause!

$75 billion bailout to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - NO WAY, NO HOW!

Moore has been really wonderful, talking about economic issues without getting bogged down in a classroom lecture. He reminds us, that the "top 1% of earners" in America pay out more than 40% of our country's income tax revenue. He brought up Jimmy Carter and the economic state his presidency left us in.

"No to Obama, No to Hillary, No to Bailouts, and No to Kyoto. Prosperity is in peril, but if we work together, we can save it."

Read more...

Stephen Moore: "Jimmy Carter was the worst president of the 20th Century"


How many of you remember gas lines?


Read more...

Phil Gramm resigns from McCain campaign

Talk about dark omens. Hat tip to Michelle Malkin:


STATEMENT BY SENATOR PHIL GRAMM
For Immediate Release
Contact: Press Office
Friday, July 18, 2008
703-650-5550


ARLINGTON, VA — Today, former U.S. Senator Phil Gramm issued the following statement:


“It is clear to me that Democrats want to attack me rather than debate Senator McCain on important economic issues facing the country. That kind of distraction hurts not only Senator McCain’s ability to present concrete programs to deal with the country’s problems, it hurts the country. To end this distraction and get on with the real debate, I hereby step down as Co-Chair of the McCain Campaign and join the growing number of rank-and-file McCain supporters.”

Read more...

You can fight city hall

One of the best quotes of the weekend so far came from Tim Phillips, national director of Americans for Prosperity. During his Friday evening speech, he reminded attendees that you really can "fight city hall." It's so important that the grassroots realize that we absolutely can effect change on the local level - not only can we fight city hall by turning out and getting everyone we know to turn out and vote "no" on irresponsible tax rate hikes and spending/bond measures, but we can take back city hall by running for office, and vetting the candidates in advance to support the very best taxpayer advocates possible.

Tim Phillips is speaking right now, kicking off the morning general session at the Summit. He reminds us, we have to send a message to elected officials that we do care about fiscal responsibility. "There is a constituency for doing the right thing."

This movement is gaining momentum; despite the rhetoric this weekend, this is actually the third taxpayer gathering of this kind in Texas, the fifth if you include the "mini-summits" held in Houston and Dallas last June. Each time, more people came, new people came, and there was a pulse that kept getting louder. This weekend, the pulse is undeniable. The movement is alive and well and kicking in Austin (of all places!!). Conservatives will TAKE BACK CITY HALL, and as Tim Phillips is saying right now, it starts right here. It starts in this room, and online, today.

Read more...

Americans for Prosperity Crashes Al Gore's Speech

AFP National Director Tim Phillips gave a rousing speech last night at the Texas Defending the American Dream summit in Austin, and treated the audience to this video of AFP activists crashing an Al Gore appearance in Washington, D.C.

Read more...

Liveblogging from the RightOnline Summit in Austin

I'm really excited to be able to report live from this weekend's RightOnline Summit, hosted by Americans for Prosperity in Austin, TX. Right now, we're waiting for the general session to begin, and I'm looking around a ballroom full of bloggers, political activists, elected officials, and other assorted politicos and grassroots types.

So far this morning, I've run into Cheryl Johnson, taxpayer advocate and Galveston County Tax Assessor-Collector; David Guenthner, communications director at the Texas Public Policy Foundation; former state representative and RPT executive director Talmadge Heflin; newly-elected RPT national committeewoman Cathie Adams; Bulverde Standard publisher Doug Kirk and his wife Valerie (they're here working on a documentary about the conference); Travis Fell, blogger at Travis Monitor; and many more.

More to come....

Read more...

July 18, 2008

A good reminder about Teddy Roosevelt

Many conservatives are fans of Teddy Roosevelt, their government education having fooled them into believing that TR was the forerunner for Goldwater, Reagan, and the movement they launched. But TR's go-get-em attitude was possibly the only thing he had in common with modern-day conservatives (a word, incidently, never used to describe the man in life). He was all for big, interventionist government, especially if it would help him get elected.

This makes me sigh heavily at the continued indoctrination common in our schools today; as a history student I sat through long lectures on TR's neoconservatism, only to realize after the fact that I'd been duped. Not only was he not a neocon, he actually had far more in common with the "moderate" wing of the modern-day Democrat Party.

John McCain's repeated attempts to warm our hearts by making allusions to TR are very nice and all, but as a Republican voter, I have to say that I was never interested in a TR-wannabe for president. I think everyone who gets a John McCain fundraising letter or phone call should send him a nickel (because of Jefferson) and a copy of The Conscience of a Conservative. I doubt we'd get his attention, but surely his teenaged interns and young staffers would benefit from the reading material.

It's worth repeating something commentator Mark Levin had to say on National Review's The Corner today:

Talking about Disraeli and TR as if 100 years and more of government intervention hasn't transpired — such as the New Deal, the Fair Deal, the Square Deal, the Great Society — is pundit malpractice....TR was never considered a conservative. He was a populist verging on progressive.


Read more...

TODAY AND TOMORROW ONLY!!!!!

Are you in the Austin area, or can you get here before tomorrow morning??

If so, join us at the Renaissance Arboretum for THE DEFENDING THE AMERICAN DREAM SUMMIT, hosted by Americans for Prosperity and RightOnline. The first official gathering for conservative bloggers and political activists seeking to meet other bloggers and get involved in the new media revolution!

Get to hear from Michael Steele, Michelle Malkin, Robert Novak, Erick Erickson, Bob Barr, and MANY MORE!!!

Just $59, and $29 for students!!

Read more...

July 12, 2008

R.I.P. Tony Snow - 1955-2008

I had a very cool opportunity when I was in college and the chapter chairman of my school's Young Conservatives of Texas. I had become friends with a promoter for a Dallas area talk radio station, 570 KLIF. He got me a VIP pass to a speaking engagement for one of their syndicated hosts. That host was Tony Snow.

I got to hear his speech, of course, but beforehand I had the opportunity to go to the VIP suite to meet the man himself. I was easily the youngest person in the room, and terribly out of place in my jeans and college polo. But Tony Snow was an easy person to approach and talk to, and he was genuinely interested in what my college club had been doing (we had made headlines with an event earlier in the year, including on Fox News - we weren't totally obscure). He chatted about his own experiences in college, asked everyone their opinions about golf and joked about the game he'd played earlier that day.

His speech was great, reminding conservatives that we had not won and still had a long road ahead (this was in 2005).

His colon cancer was announced later about two weeks after this event.

Losing Tony today was a blow for our cause, our country, and most of all for humanity. He was a good man who spoke up about his beliefs and didn't back down in the face of harsh, mean-spirited criticism. I'm praying for his family and for his friends tonight.

Read more...

July 10, 2008

Free Speech Codes at Private Universities

National Review's Ramesh Ponnuru posted on the Corner today about speech codes at private universities, saying that conservatives shouldn't object in principle to such codes because "nobody is forced to attend a college that does such a thing."

Great point, though it does remind me of the taunts we got from pro-code personages at UNT. No one said you have to come to school here, they said. Go to UT, then, if you think their system is so great. For the modern public university student, especially as prices climb, it's not really about choice. So the argument is damaged on those grounds for public univerisities. By and large, for public universities, it's a straight free speech, First Amendment issue. Public universities are taxpayer-funded, the grounds are public, and in most states the universities are extensions of state government and therefore bound by the US Constitution.

Now, private universities are a totally different ballgame.

I agree with Ponnuru in that a conservative has no reason to disagree with speech codes at private universities at first glance. Unless it's for political reasons, the proprietors at private schools have every right to enforce civility on their own terms. Why? They are privately funded and for the large part do not accept public funding.

It gets a bit dicey when you get into the funding issue, however, because a lot of private schools do receive some level of public funds, particularly federal financial aid. We could go all day on that one, since conservatives should also, in theory, disagree with both federal financial aid and in particular with private universities taking advantage of it (again, nobody forces you to go to a private school). Private schools are often founded for very specific purposes, and while they appear to operate the same as public schools, they hold to different curricula and teaching standards. They may accept money from the state, but so far that hasn't meant that they must fall in line with the public universities.

When it comes to conduct codes (what free speech codes are supposedly intended to be), the private university automatically has discretion because the government did not found nor does it run the school. It's just like how K-12 private schools have discretion over dress codes, in the end.

It doesn't follow that a student, upon entering an institution of higher learning, should be stripped of his or her rights that are protected under the US Constitution. However, a private school is not an extension of the government and the proprietors are free to choose how they run it - and, as Ponnuru says, nobody forces any one to go to that school. There's the beauty of a free society! Free speech codes and free speech containment areas at public schools are an outright violation of the First Amendment, however, because the schools are an extension of the government. The Constitution only truly guarantees that the government does not have the right to violate certain inalienable rights of the individual; what private entities do has always, by and large, been the province of the entity without encroachment by the government.

All that said, a student at a private university, as a paying customer, should absolutely challenge the standard set forth if he so chooses. The private university provides a service for the exchange of money, and as a business is accountable to it's shareholders (the people who pay money to attend or provide support). Instead of seeking help from the courts or legislature, a private school student wishing to change the environment at his school should go to alumni organizations, the student council/government, and other such groups.

Read more...

Tell me again, who has the largest tax burden?

From the Wall Street Journal (subscription only):

New data from the IRS will be out in a few weeks on who pays how much in
taxes. My contacts at the Treasury Department tell me that for the first
time in decades, and perhaps ever, the richest 1% of tax filers will have
paid more than 40% of the income tax burden. The top 50% will account for
97% of all federal income taxes, while the bottom 50% will have paid just 3%.
Hat tip to Evan Maloney.

You know, it's utterly amazing that Democrats still get away with the lines about Republicans who want to tax the poor.

This article, of course, just refers to federal income taxes. Woe unto those who pay heavy state income taxes. And, for those of us in Texas who face ever-increasing property taxes (perhaps the most ludicrous of all tax burdens imaginable - buy a home, pay rent to the government forever!), this has got to seem just beyond insufferable.

But who will read what the study and take these facts into account? Definitely not the average voter, who cheerfully goes to the polls to vote for tax-and-spenders and for heavy-interest bond packages, then complains about the tax bill. And you gotta think, the so-called "stimulus package" checks we all got were on some level an attempt by the current tax-and-spend federal government to quiet the thought at the backs of our minds about how high our taxes really are.

Insane.

Read more...

July 09, 2008

McCain and La Raza

Michelle Malkin laid out 15 things we should know about La Raza ("the race") today, and Laura Morales points out that both Obama and McCain will be speaking at the 40th Annual La Raza Convention to try and win over the Hispanic vote.

Let's just set aside for a moment the fact that John McCain didn't bother showing up at the state convention in Texas in June, and that he's ignored conservative voters at every opportunity (even refusing to speak with James Dobson). He's dead set on leaving the social base behind, and he's not exactly doing heavy lifting for the fiscal base.

But he'll happily set out to gain the accolades of a racist organization, which has at every chance opposed post-9/11 national security measures, opposed immigration reform and bilingual education reform, and provides weak cover for radical nationalist groups like Mecha.

He'll court the radical liberal Hispanic vote, but not reach out to conservative Hispanics on their issues (abortion, gay marriage, and yes, even illegal immigration).

Someone in the McCain camp needs a wake-up call and badly. He's the REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE. He needs to support the REPUBLICAN PARTY PLATFORM. He needs to court REPUBLICAN VOTERS, who, if they turned out in force this fall, could conceivably put him far ahead of Barack Obama.

The question is quickly becoming, do the Republicans even want the presidency in 2008?

Read more...

"How many Americans understand that Congress is now run by Democrats?" - Limbaugh

An excellent question!

Nancy Pelosi, dear ones, is a Democrat. Her colleagues are, in the majority, Democrats. They all took over in 2006.

El Rushbo had this to say today, in full:

This month, just 9% say Congress is doing a good or excellent job. Most
voters (52%) say Congress is doing a poor job, which ties the record high in
that dubious category.' Now, amidst all of this, with a 9% approval
rating, an all-time low, the media template is still what? That the
Democrats are going to pick up all these seats in the House and they're going to
pick up all these seats in the Senate. It's a foregone conclusion.
Now, if people are this upset with Congress, and the president's numbers are
higher -- you know, this is a risky thing to try to analyze. You have to
ask how many Americans understand that Congress is now run by Democrats?
How many of them think that Congress is just an extension of the White House and
are blaming it on Republicans? Well, you don't know. But I think one
of the keys here in every call I get, and every comment I get from people
talking about this, whether it's here on the program or in my highly focused
personal and private life, it's the gasoline price. The gasoline price is
the root of everything because that affects the cost of food, the cost of
leisure time activity, the cost of entertainment, and it's a gold mine. It is
simply a golden opportunity for the Republican Party here to really make some
big hay.

Read more...

July 08, 2008

You need to be at the Defending the American Dream Summit

We need conservative activists online! Not only are the blogs leading in Texas policy advocacy (most credit Burnt Orange Report and others for extending the speaker's race in the Texas House last session), but they are also being quoted in the news... conservatives MUST take up arms and come to the the AFP Defending the American Dream Summit on July 18 and 19! Check it out today at http://www.defendingthedream.org/TX and sign up!

It's inexpensive (use my name and get the $29 rate!) and features such leaders in the cause as Michael Steele, Robert Novak, Merrie Spaeth, Barry Goldwater, Jr., and Michelle Malkin. It's amazing that such an event is taking place in Austin just as we've taken back the county party and are gearing up to recruit and spread our message like never before!

http://www.defendingthedream.org/TX and pass it on to your friends! It's at the Renaissance Arboretum in north Austin. Let's make sure CONSERVATIVE Republicans are there in force! If you can't come to the whole thing, you can still come to the dinner on Friday night and to the events on Saturday - the Reagan/Goldwater Dinner feature Barry Goldwater, Jr. as the keynote speaker! Take a look at what the Left is up to (in Travis County, of course!):

The Nation - July 1, 2008
HOW DEMOCRATS COULD TURN TEXAS INTO THE BLUE STAR STATE
"Did I mention that it's fun to be a Democrat in Texas?" asks Matt Glazer, editor in chief of the Burnt Orange Report, the state's leading progressive blog. He has, in fact, mentioned it a couple of times over beers at Scholz Garten, a legendary liberal hangout in Austin, and always with the same glimmer of happy bemusement behind his black-frame blogger specs. I'd been seeing that look in Democrats' eyes all over Texas in early June--at their raucous, record-breaking state convention, at local Democratic shindigs, in giddily overburdened Obama HQs. "It's like everyone who toiled on that Democratic death march for years, when it was so difficult, is now seeing daylight," says Josh Berthume of the Dallas suburb Denton, editor in chief of TheTexasBlue.com and another key player in a vigorous blogosphere that has helped ignite the startling Democratic flare-up here, in the bright red heart of Tom DeLay and Karl Rove's "permanent" Republican majority.

Read more...

Rep. Joe Driver wants concealed carry on campus!

Huge news in today's Abilene Reporter-News. State Rep. Joe Driver (R-Garland) is calling for Texas' concealed handgun law to extend to college campuses.

Quite the news story, because this is the kind of thing we need to openly debate in the wake of the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision on Heller. The right to bear arms has been affirmed by the Court as written out in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution (not that some of us needed the Court to tell us that, since we can read, but these days it doesn't hurt to have a little reassurance). Now, we could debate all day long if we should have to obtain permits from the government before carrying a weapon, but the issue at hand is whether college students, ages 21 and up in accordance with current Texas law, should be allowed to have their concealed handguns with them on campus.

In the wake of Virginia Tech, it's clear that college campuses aren't havens of safety (not that we needed the massacre in Virginia to tell us that). Once on campus, students are stripped of some of their constitutional rights (freedom of assembly is limited, freedom of speech is limited, and the right to bear arms is non-existant). On public, taxpayer-funded property! So if a gunman, or some other assailant attempts to hurt or kill one or many students, the only provision to stop them is the campus security squad.

Tell me, how many people did the Virginia Tech gunman shoot before the cops/security arrived?

The scare talk doesn't hold water. When we passed concealed carry in Texas, the naysayers swore up and down that there would be shootouts at every four-way stop. As Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson likes to say, how many of you have been in a shootout at a four-way stop since the passage of that law?

Critics are fond of bringing up drunken frat boys as another reason concealed carry is a bad plan. Well, drunken frat boys also increase the number of unreported rapes - to hear the feminist groups tell it, anyway. One could argue that drunken frat boys are the problem, not concealed weapons.

Wasn't there once a quite compelling argument that if you're old enough to join the military and die for your country, you should be old enough to drink and numb the pain? Granted, the legal drinking age is 21 and not 18, but I think the argument is again relevant. If you're old enough to drive a car, join the military, drink alcohol and purchase cigarettes and lottery tickets, you oughta be free to carry your own instrument of self-defense.

Lastly, it ain't easy (or cheap) to get a handgun and a license to carry it. You have to go through training, and of course you have to actually purchase a handgun. And honestly, lugging the thing around may prove a deterrent to carrying it in the first place; handguns ain't light, and many college campuses are quite sprawling.

We should have the right to protect ourselves, no matter where we are.

Read more...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP